Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Are we there yet?

Preface:
There are so many people in Cambridge right now who have been studying like mad for weeks and who are staring down (or already suffered through) massive exams that determine an ungodly percentage of their degree results.  Compared to that, I'm having a walk in the park.  But still...

It's a bit of a stressful week.  The three big things I needed to write for this term were: a conference paper, an undergraduate lecture, and my first-year review piece.  Now, I actually had about the right number of words for all of these a week or so ago.  But somehow, the closer the conference got (it was a couple days ago), the more time I found myself spending on trying to get that paper in shape, neglecting the other two...This was capped by a last-minute paper exchange with a fellow student whose opinion I really respect, resulting in a flurry of editing before heading to London.

I'm happy to report that the conference was a fun though long day, showcasing people from incredibly different time periods and interests.  My talk was right at the end, but it seemed to go well.  Yay!  Now back in Cambridge, I have a few days to finish the other monster pieces.  [Quiz: who caught the reference to Sesame Street's "Monsterpiece Theater"?  If you don't know what I'm talking about, click here and watch the related videos.]

I've actually felt rather productive today -- but after most of a "productive" day, I've slogged through editing and adding to six pages.  Out of 20.  Oy vey.  Must must must make it all the way through the first-year thing today, then finish lecture tomorrow.  So it's the Mac and me and the Jerwood makes three tonight.  (Imagine that to swing music.)

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Cricket explained for Americans

So in case you haven't been tracking my facebook status, I've actually gotten to play in a couple matches with the Cambridge University Women's Cricket Club.  This causes my friends to boast that "Sarah plays cricket for the university" -- which is not untrue, but somewhat deceptive in terms of how good it implies I am.  Still, for a cheap thrill, check out my player profile on the team webpage:
http://www.cucc.net/pages/Players-squad-Womens_Squad

Now, cricket has this terrible reputation for being impossible to understand.  Aaron Sorkin certainly seems to think so; there's a whole episode of Sports Night in which the cast and crew are trying to understand some incredible game so that they can talk about it on the show, and in an episode of The West Wing, President Bartlet quips, "Now, I am an educated man, Charlie, but when someone tries to explain cricket to me, all I want to do is hit him in the head with a teapot."

I'm here to insist that it's really, truly not that difficult to understand!  Especially if you already know the basics of baseball.  Part of the problem, I think, is the terminology -- so here it is, the basics of cricket explained using baseball terminology (forgive me, cricket fans).

Like baseball, you win by scoring more runs than the other team.  But instead of a diamond of four bases to run around, there are two bases that you run back and forth between, and the outfield is 360 degrees all around.

Like baseball, there's a batter who hits a ball in order to be able to run.  There's also an extra batter who runs back and forth.  They alternate who actually receives the pitch.  Here's a picture from our last match, which was against Oxford (click to enlarge).  On the left-hand side, next to the umpire in black trousers, you can see the pitcher ("bowler") about to throw the ball.  A bit to the right is the extra batter standing ready to run, and on the far right is the active batter with bat raised.


Like baseball, the batter is out if one of a few things happen:
  • the fielders catch a fly ball
  • the fielders get the ball back to one of the bases before the one of the batters gets there
  • the pitch gets past the batter and hits the wicket (3 sticks in the ground where a baseball catcher would be). [Note: there's no penalty for swinging and missing as long as the ball doesn't hit the wicket.]
  • the pitch hits the batter in the leg and that leg was directly in front of the wicket. (Without this rule, the batter could just stand completely in front of the wicket and make it impossible to get out that way.)
Like baseball, after a certain number of outs, the inning is over. In cricket, it's 10 outs. If 10 outs don't happen, the inning ends after a fixed number of pitches.
The big difference: instead of alternating batting and fielding throughout the game, one team does all their batting first, then you have a tea/lunch break, then the other team does all their batting. To be honest, I'm not a fan of this part, because it means that the team that bats first is playing in a vacuum and doesn't know how many runs they'll really need in order to win, whereas the second team simply has to get one more than their opponents.
So there you go! Not so bad, right? If you want to know more, Wikipedia's entry is pretty handy. It only remains to say that it's really fun to watch people's reactions to an American girl playing cricket. For one thing, it's not a super-common sport for women just yet, but more to the point Americans just don't know anything about it. Generally, people are surprised, amused, and impressed, in roughly that order.

Monday, May 16, 2011

Study nooks and rambling

As you saw in my last post, I have a few things that require me and my computer to be joined at the hip for the next couple weeks.  Over the course of the year, I've definitely found the spots where I work well, so allow me to take you on a tour.


Number one with a bullet is in the English faculty library.  The library has a number of large tables out in the open on the ground floor, but I feel on display there, and there's too much to look around at.  However, the "first" (American second) floor only partially covers the ground floor, and there's a little wall along the edge.  Along this wall and next to the bookcases are individual desks, and if I can snag one of these, I'm good to go.  They're bathed in natural light from the large windows, and you get a sense of people around you, but it also manages to feel fairly private.  Here's a view from about halfway down the line of desks:



What's that on my computer screen?  Glad you asked.  It's a section of my first-year review piece titled Richard Chenevix Trench and Popularizing Philology.  This Trench guy was a major influence in making the basics of language scholarship accessible and interesting for the general population.  There are about five books of his that I want to read over the summer.  He says great things like, "Language is fossil poetry...many a single word is itself a concentrated poem, having stores of poetical thought and imagery laid in it."  But moving on...


Happy place #2: Jerwood Library in Trinity Hall, mezzanine level, looking out at the lawn and King's College Chapel spires.


If this spot is occupied, I walk to the other side of the room and face across the public bridge (charmingly known as "orgasm bridge" because it's so steep that it's an effort to cycle up) and over the river to a little field.


In other news, by this time next week I'll have given my first-ever conference talk.  Check out the program (my session is at 3:00pm) by clicking here.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Too much to do = happy/stressed Sarah

Here are the big items on my to-do list:

  • Write conference talk
  • Write undergraduate lecture
  • Expand/revise my last essay for first-year review
  • Proofread a book for one of my freelance clients.  Gulp.
  • Row in preparation for May Bumps (same concept as Lent Bumps -- see earlier post)
  • Read some books that have been on the shelf for months, because they're due soon
So yeah, nothing to stress about, right? :P

But at the same time, we're seeing a lot of sunshine (albeit with cold breezes), and there are lots of opportunities to see and have fun with my Trinity Hall buddies.  And you know I love to fill my schedule to the breaking point.  Fortunately, this term is about huge exams for a lot of people, so the department isn't offering many lectures to distract me, and there is a decidedly studious air to the libraries and -- well, pretty much everywhere else.

Speaking of which, it's time to close this window of procrastination.  Until next time!